A
decent lot has happened since i last posted. Yesterday i had my follow-up
endoscopy. My lil sister was kind enough to drive me there, in my usual form i
refused to take off my shoes, and resisted everything in my drugged up haze.
The next day has a few fuzy details after i saw them start the injection, and
then it was Saturday.
I did
learn a few big things prior to my surgery. I learned that my treatment would
begin later, because they're trying to get me on drugs that will have
potentially less side effects (but sadly no data to back that up at the moment
due to the state of my liver) and will take half the time. An article came out a while ago, and i had a
comment exchange with a friend on my FB
wall, i've attached it below as i'm sure many of you have similar questions if
you've seen the article.
"
So recently I've noticed that a few people have read a BBC article. Yes a version of this will be used in part of the therapy i will soon be on. The numbers reflect people with functioning livers, i am not among those. So this is incredibly promising, however not the golden ticket it would appear to be.
So recently I've noticed that a few people have read a BBC article. Yes a version of this will be used in part of the therapy i will soon be on. The numbers reflect people with functioning livers, i am not among those. So this is incredibly promising, however not the golden ticket it would appear to be.
Hepatitis C trial a 'turning point' http://www.bbc.com/news/health-26987653
A new treatment for hepatitis C cured 90% of patients with the
infection in 12 weeks, say scientists after studies in Europe and the US.
Friend: Thanks for the post. Will
you please explain where the study shows that the numbers reflect only people
with functioning livers? They stated that all participants were experiencing
liver cirrhosis. I think there might be a gap in my knowledge between cirrhosis
and functionality of the liver. Additionally, they state in the preface of the
article that Hepatitis C can be spread via "blood , or bodily fluids of an
infected person," which is erroneous, right? I thought that it's only
spread through blood to blood contact.
*Edit-Here's the original
article. It's pretty heavy, but explains the details:
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1402869...
Me: Bodily fluids is technically correct, because
blood is one. There can also be blood in other fluids. Blood to blood is
correct.
Cirrhosis has levels. I have
advanced liver cirrhosis, for
reference.....http://www.meddean.luc.edu/lumen/MEdEd/orfpath/cirhosis.htm
I have a decompensated liver.
Me: I know they do, I asked my doctor who was
familiar with this information, and confirmed with other GIs.
Friend: Thanks for the information/clarifications.
The article that you linked on liver cirrhosis states that it is considered to
be a "self-perpetuating irreversible process." Is that for all
stages?
Me: Once the tissue becomes necrotic, or starts
to exhibit signs of liver failure..., the only method is removal/replacement.
early states though...As long as
the nodules aren't fuckall crazy (aka they don't regenerate and possibly spawn
cancerous lil shits) it can be dealt with and managed depending upon the
remaining healthy cells.
Early phases: yes it can be dealt
with. Late phases the only solution is removal.
"
Another dismaying fact is that i
have rather active regenerative nodules. but! all is not lost! the world is
still fantastic and beautiful, because, yes my doctor and advocates have a hard
case to sell; but they have a case to sell. Me. And the more faces i see beside
me, the more i realize how much of a product their selling. My support network
always comes through, dozens of friends, realistically dozens of family members
is what i should say. i am constantly surprised by the outpouring support and
love pushing for my success. thank you
all ever so much. <3
Only a few months left, sign up for 10 bucks! JOIN THE LIVER LIFE RACE. or donate, that's cool too!